Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University — Biomedical Watch V2

Traitements4programmes

Essais1liés

Publications0liées

SourceDBlocale

Traitements

4

Molécule	Indication / population	Phase	Objectif	Pays	Résultat
Deep Friction MassageBackground: Non-specific low back pain is a leading cause of global disability and physical, psychological, and socioeconomic burdens. While instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization has shown benefits for pain, disability, and range of motion, it remains unclear whether these effects stem from the instrument itself, mobilization mechanisms, or placebo factors. Additionally, no prior study has directly compared it with deep friction massage. Objective: To compare the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization, deep friction massage, and sham treatment on pain, disability, lumbar range of motion, pressure pain threshold, psychological status, and electromyographical activation in individuals with non specific low back pain. Methods: This trial will recruit 66 participants aged 18 to 60 years with chronic low back pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups and receive a standardized four week rehabilitation program of two sessions per week, including hot packs, stretching, strengthening. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the first session, and after four weeks using pain intensity scales, disability indices, range of motion measurements, Page 2of 6 surface electromyography as primary outcome measures, and pressure pain thresholds, and psychological status evaluations as secondary. Conclusion: This study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these interventions, helping clarify the specific therapeutic value of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization.	Myopathies	Non applicable	Traitement symptomatique		À vérifier
Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue MobilizationBackground: Non-specific low back pain is a leading cause of global disability and physical, psychological, and socioeconomic burdens. While instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization has shown benefits for pain, disability, and range of motion, it remains unclear whether these effects stem from the instrument itself, mobilization mechanisms, or placebo factors. Additionally, no prior study has directly compared it with deep friction massage. Objective: To compare the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization, deep friction massage, and sham treatment on pain, disability, lumbar range of motion, pressure pain threshold, psychological status, and electromyographical activation in individuals with non specific low back pain. Methods: This trial will recruit 66 participants aged 18 to 60 years with chronic low back pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups and receive a standardized four week rehabilitation program of two sessions per week, including hot packs, stretching, strengthening. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the first session, and after four weeks using pain intensity scales, disability indices, range of motion measurements, Page 2of 6 surface electromyography as primary outcome measures, and pressure pain thresholds, and psychological status evaluations as secondary. Conclusion: This study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these interventions, helping clarify the specific therapeutic value of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization.	Myopathies	Non applicable	Traitement symptomatique		À vérifier
Sham Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue MobilizationBackground: Non-specific low back pain is a leading cause of global disability and physical, psychological, and socioeconomic burdens. While instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization has shown benefits for pain, disability, and range of motion, it remains unclear whether these effects stem from the instrument itself, mobilization mechanisms, or placebo factors. Additionally, no prior study has directly compared it with deep friction massage. Objective: To compare the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization, deep friction massage, and sham treatment on pain, disability, lumbar range of motion, pressure pain threshold, psychological status, and electromyographical activation in individuals with non specific low back pain. Methods: This trial will recruit 66 participants aged 18 to 60 years with chronic low back pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups and receive a standardized four week rehabilitation program of two sessions per week, including hot packs, stretching, strengthening. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the first session, and after four weeks using pain intensity scales, disability indices, range of motion measurements, Page 2of 6 surface electromyography as primary outcome measures, and pressure pain thresholds, and psychological status evaluations as secondary. Conclusion: This study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these interventions, helping clarify the specific therapeutic value of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization.	Myopathies	Non applicable	Traitement symptomatique		À vérifier
Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue MobilizationBackground: Non-specific low back pain is a leading cause of global disability and physical, psychological, and socioeconomic burdens. While instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization has shown benefits for pain, disability, and range of motion, it remains unclear whether these effects stem from the instrument itself, mobilization mechanisms, or placebo factors. Additionally, no prior study has directly compared it with deep friction massage. Objective: To compare the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization, deep friction massage, and sham treatment on pain, disability, lumbar range of motion, pressure pain threshold, psychological status, and electromyographical activation in individuals with non specific low back pain. Methods: This trial will recruit 66 participants aged 18 to 60 years with chronic low back pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups and receive a standardized four week rehabilitation program of two sessions per week, including hot packs, stretching, strengthening. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the first session, and after four weeks using pain intensity scales, disability indices, range of motion measurements, Page 2of 6 surface electromyography as primary outcome measures, and pressure pain thresholds, and psychological status evaluations as secondary. Conclusion: This study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of these interventions, helping clarify the specific therapeutic value of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization.	Myopathies	Non applicable	Traitement symptomatique		À vérifier

Essais cliniques

1

Molécule	Indication / population	Phase	NCT	Titre	Statut
Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization	Myopathies	Non applicable	NCT07921784	Effects of IASTM, Deep Friction Massage, and Sham Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Electromyographical Activation, Pain and Function in Non-Specific Low Back Pain	NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Publications

0

Molécule	Indication / population	Titre	Journal	Date
Aucune publication.